vs
Redmine and OpenProject share a common origin but have diverged significantly in their approach to open-source project management.
Both tools solve the same fundamental problem: providing teams with issue tracking, project planning, and collaboration capabilities without proprietary licensing costs. They both support Gantt charts, time tracking, and role-based access control. The core difference lies in their development philosophy and target audience.
Redmine follows a traditional open-source model with a plugin-centric architecture. The core remains lean while functionality extends through community plugins. This creates flexibility but also fragmentation—plugin quality varies widely and compatibility issues arise between versions.
OpenProject took a different path after forking in 2011. They focus on an integrated experience with enterprise features built directly into the core application. This reduces plugin dependency but increases complexity for self-hosters.
| Capability | Redmine | OpenProject |
|---|---|---|
| Core license | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Primary language | Ruby on Rails | Ruby on Rails |
| Gantt charts | Built-in | Built-in |
| Time tracking | Built-in | Built-in |
| Agile boards | Via plugin | Built-in (Enterprise) |
| Cost reporting | Via plugin | Built-in |
| Mobile app | No | Yes (Enterprise) |
| Plugin ecosystem | Extensive | Limited |
| Self-hosted | Free | Community/Enterprise tiers |
| Cloud hosting | Third-party only | Official option available |
Organizations rarely run both simultaneously due to overlapping functionality. However, some teams use Redmine for engineering issue tracking while OpenProject handles cross-functional project portfolios. Migration tools exist for moving from Redmine to OpenProject, though the process requires planning for custom fields and plugin data.