
InvenTree and Part-DB compete in the open-source parts inventory management space, both offering web-based interfaces for tracking components across multiple locations. They solve similar problems but with different design philosophies and target audiences.
Part-DB is purpose-built for electronic components and makers. Its standout feature is native KiCad 8+ integration through HTTP libraries, letting PCB designers browse stock levels and pull component data directly into their EDA workflow. It connects to electronics distributors (Octopart, DigiKey, Mouser, Farnell, TME) for automatic part metadata and pricing. The permission system supports SAML SSO through Keycloak, making it suitable for university labs and makerspaces.
InvenTree takes a broader approach. While it handles electronics fine, it is not limited to them. The BOM management and build order system suit general manufacturing and assembly workflows. The plugin architecture supports label printers (Zebra), barcode scanning, and custom extensions beyond the electronics domain. InvenTree also offers a native mobile app, whereas Part-DB relies on its responsive web interface.
| Capability | InvenTree | Part-DB |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | General parts inventory | Electronic components |
| EDA integration | Via plugins/API | Native KiCad 8+ HTTP library |
| Distributor APIs | Manual/API integration | Built-in Octopart, DigiKey, Mouser, Farnell, TME |
| BOM management | Yes, with build orders | Yes, with project-based withdrawals |
| Mobile app | Native iOS/Android | Responsive web only |
| Tech stack | Python/Django | PHP/Symfony |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
Generally no — both want to be your source of truth for parts inventory. However, a large organization might use Part-DB for R&D electronics and InvenTree for production inventory, syncing via their respective REST APIs.