Executives and non-technical stakeholders receive dashboards with charts but no explanation of what changed, why it matters, or what to do. Analysts spend hours writing the same narrative explanations every week (earnings summaries, performance reports, executive briefings) by translating numbers from dashboards into prose. At high volume — 300+ earnings reports per quarter, 400,000 regulatory filings per year — manual narrative writing is infeasible without automation.
Two distinct patterns exist: (1) Template-based NLG (Automated Insights/Wordsmith, Arria) maps structured data to pre-authored template trees with conditional logic — high accuracy, low hallucination risk, suitable for regulated outputs (financial reporting, compliance). (2) LLM-based narrative generation (GPT-4, Claude) generates free-form prose given data context — higher expressiveness, higher hallucination risk, requires human-in-the-loop review for regulated contexts. Production deployments typically combine both: template-based for regulated/financial narratives, LLM for exploratory and conversational contexts. BI platforms increasingly embed narrative features natively (Tableau Data Stories, Power BI Smart Narratives, QuickSight Q).
Template-based NLG (Automated Insights/Wordsmith / Arria NLG / Quill) + LLM narrative generation (GPT-4 / Claude via API) + BI native narrative features (Tableau Data Stories / Power BI Smart Narratives / Looker Explore / QuickSight Q) + human review workflow.
Nothing downstream yet.